Legal Opinion

Interstate Tea Co. v. Alt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The action is for an injunction against a former employee to enforce a negative covenant not to solicit any persons, etc., who are, or in the future may become, plaintiff’s customers. The covenant contains no limitation as to time or space, is harsh and oppressive to defendant and is not necessary for the protection of plaintiff’s business. Such a covenant is against public policy and will not be enforced in a court of equity. (Diamond Match Co. v. Roeber, 106 N. Y. 473; McCall Co. v. Wright, 133 App. Div. 62;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Kaumagraph Co. v. . Stampagraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. McCall Co. v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. McCall Co. v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. Witkop v. BoyceNew York Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lynch v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Steinfeld v. HausenNew York Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API