Legal Opinion
Utica Mutual Insurance v. Langevin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 5, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.
It is the plaintiff’s position that although driving the truck within his employment, the employee was making an unpermitted use of it in carrying Langevin as a passenger, and that therefore the Lability for injuring him was uninsured. It is argued that the non-habihty of the employer (Dearborn v. Fuller, 79 N. H. 217; Wilkinson v. Company, 79 N. H. 335; Ellsmore v. Railroad, 80 N. H. 100; Cain v. Wickens, 81 N. H. 99; Roulias v. Crafts, 81 N. H. 107; Moulton v. Langley, 81 N. H. 138; Groatz v. Day, 81 N. H. 417; Ramsdell v. Company, 86 N. H. 457) reheves the insurer.
This does not follow. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sauriolle v. O'GormanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
- Dearborn v. FullerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
- Moulton v. LangleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
- Ramsdell v. Varick Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- Cain v. WickensSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WachsmithWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ChurchDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
- CONDENSER SERVICE, ETC., CO., INC. v. American Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Johnson v. National Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.