Legal Opinion

Moulton v. Langley

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 6, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The practice in this state, when a new trial is granted, does not require a re-trial of the issues in which no error was committed, if these issues can be separated from the ones in which the error occurred. Lisbon v. Lyman, 49 N. H. 553, 582-605; Piper v. Railroad, 75 N. H. 435, 446; McBride v. Huckins, 76 N. H. 206, 213; Doody v. Railroad, 77 N. H. 161, 166; Morin v. Company, 78 N. H. 567, 570.

The misconduct of a jury in returning a verdict for an unreasonably small sum, in disregard of the evidence and of the instructions of the court, is presumed to extend to the issue of liability in the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  3. Parizo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  4. Kistler v. WagonerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Utica Mutual Insurance v. LangevinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API