Legal Opinion

Staiger v. Holman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1932PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.

When a judgment is rendered against a party, his payment of the sum awarded will not preclude him from maintaining an appeal, unless it satisfactorily appears to the court that the payment was not coerced and was made with a view of settlement : Eilers Piano House v. Pick, 58 Or. 54 (113 P. 54). This ruling following the holding in Edwards v. Perkins, 7 Or. 149, where it was held that a party voluntarily paying a judgment rendered against him is not thereby precluded from prosecuting an appeal therefrom. The reason assigned for the determination there reached was based upon the fact that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moores v. MooresOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Edwards v. PerkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  3. McFadden v. SwinertonOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Duniway v. Cellars-Murton Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Eilers Piano House v. PickOregon Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Franzen v. DubinokCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Unander v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Cottrell Et Ux. v. Prier Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Central Lincoln People's Utility District v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Fritz v. FritzOregon Supreme Court · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API