State v. Montejano
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, C.J.
¶1 The felony riot statute provides, “A person is guilty ... if, acting with three or more other persons, he or she knowingly and unlawfully uses or threatens to use force, or in any way participates in the use of such force, against any other person or against property” and “the actor is armed with a deadly weapon.” RCW 9A.84.010(1), (2)(b). The sole issue on appeal is whether the crime can be committed by complicity under RCW 9 A. 08-.020 when the accused was not armed and did not know that the other participants were armed. We conclude that, because the riot statute defines the nature and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Densley v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. CannWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Koenig v. City of Des MoinesWashington Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State of Washington v. Salvador Garcia SanchezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013