Legal Opinion

State v. Hayes

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 24, 2011No. 66646-1-IPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 A defendant must be a leader of a criminal profiteering organization, not just a member, in order to be convicted of the offense of leading organized crime. In this case, it was error to give instructions on accomplice liability that permitted appellant Larry Hayes to be convicted of leading organized crime even if the jury found that Hayes was merely aiding and abetting the leader. We therefore reverse the conviction. Two convictions for possession of a stolen vehicle are also reversed. The remaining twelve convictions are affirmed.

¶2 The trial of Hayes began on May 20, 2009. He was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. OwensWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. State Of Washington, V David Palaukekala MakekauCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. State v. TylerWashington Supreme Court · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API