Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Dean

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1957PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

In one action, which may be called the “state fund” case, the respondent Power Company is the sole plaintiff. Apparently the respondent’s deceased employee left no person dependent upon him for support and the complaint alleges that pursuant to sec. 102.49 (5), Stats. 1953, respondent paid $4,000 into the state treasury and that the death resulted from the negligence of Dean. The cause of action stated in the complaint is one for reimbursement for such payment created by sec. 102.29 (2). Appellant’s answer denies negligence on the part of Dean but as an additional defense pleads that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clark v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Simmons v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Eleason v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Britt v. BuggsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Wisconsin Public Service Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Southern California Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. WesoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API