Legal Opinion

Portland General Electric Co. v. Jungwirth Logging, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 1997No. CCV 9406043; CA A89234PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*791ARMSTRONG, J.

Defendant Jungwirth Logging, Inc. (JLI) appeals a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Portland General Electric Company (PGE). We affirm.

The following facts are undisputed. JLI employed Mike Hartsell to work on a logging crew. In February 1994, Hartsell was electrocuted when a crew member threw a wire rope over a high voltage PGE power fine, causing it to ground on equipment that Hartsell was touching. JLI had not notified PGE of its logging activity and had not guarded effectively against accidents involving the high voltage power line, even though it was required to do both…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Astoria v. Astoria & Columbia River R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Riedel v. First Nat. Bank of Or.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. King v. Oregon Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. White v. Jubitz Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. Romero-NavarroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. CeballosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Wynia v. FickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Estate of Tressel v. TresselCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API