Legal Opinion

King v. Oregon Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 31, 1996No. 94-CV-0190-MS; CA A88762PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

In this declaratory judgment action, defendant appeals from a summary judgment for plaintiff Tanya D. King. Because we conclude that the trial court erred as a matter of law, ORCP 47 C, we reverse and remand.

The facts are undisputed. On March 10,1993, plaintiff and her two minor children were seriously injured in a motor vehicle accident. Before and after the accident, plaintiff received public assistance and medical benefits from defendant, the Oregon Department of Human Services, Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD). Plaintiff settled her accident claim for $75,000. AFSD then asserted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kahrs v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. White v. Jubitz Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Portland General Electric Co. v. Jungwirth Logging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Portland General Electric Co. v. Jungwirth Logging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API