Legal Opinion
Bradley v. United States
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided January 28, 1971No. A-81-69 CivPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This action was brought to set aside and annul an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission Transfer Board [hereinafter referred to as the Commission and Transfer Board, respectively], which authorized the transfer of motor carrier operating rights between two small carriers in Wrangell, Alaska. This suit was filed by the only competing interstate trucker on Wrangell Island, whose vigorous protests were rejected by the Commission.
On June 24, 1968, Peter C. McCormack III, doing business as Etolin *371Transfer & Storage Company [hereinafter referred to as Etolin] and Fritz Schloe, doing…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Lang Transp. Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1950
- Inland Motor Freight v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1941
- Younger Brothers, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1965
- A. L. Root Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Humboldt Express, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Robert L. Curtis and Southern Forwarding Co., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc. v. Skjonsby Truck Line, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Gray Line Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Chabut v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Cargo Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.