Legal Opinion

Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 2, 1956No. C. D. 1765Published

1Opinion of the Court

LawRence, Judge:

The collector of customs classified an importation of cylindrical steel rolls in paragraph 344 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 344) and imposed duty thereon at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem.

The importer claims that said rolls should be classified in paragraph 372 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 372), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, as parts of machine tools and subjected to duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem.

The pertinent text of the statutes referred to is here set forth:

Paragraph 344…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Industrial Operations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. Benecke v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API