Legal Opinion

Twyeffort v. Unexcelled Manufacturing Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1933PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.

The plaintiffs were members of a firm of lawyers, practicing their profession under the name of Twyeffort & DuBois. Twyeffort, while a member of such firm, for a period of about ten years was general counsel for the defendant corporation. The retainer covered “ all legal work of a routine and general nature, exclusive of litigative, out-of-town and out-of-the ordinary services.” When the defendant, on the 15th of February, 1929, terminated the defendant’s employment of Twyeffort, there was still due upon the general retainer the sum of $375, which the defendant never paid. In addition,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hastings v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Hardin v. Morgan Lithograph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. St. John v. Fulton Market Realty CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sterling Industries, Inc. v. Ball Bearing Pen Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. West View Hills, Inc. v. Lizau Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Goldston v. Bandwidth Technology Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Schwartz v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  5. Management Technologies, Inc. v. MorrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API