Legal Opinion
St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. v. Janssen-Counotte
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 18, 2015No. Case No. 3:15-mc-00099-SIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR TRANSFER
MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.
Plaintiff St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. (“St. Jude” or “St. Jude U.S.”) previously brought a motion to compel compliance with a third-party subpoena that it served upon Biotronik, Inc. (“Biotronik” or “Bio-tronik U.S.”). After that motion was fully briefed and argued, the Court granted St. Jude’s motion in part and appointed a special master to assist in resolving the remainder of the issues. Dkts. 19, 20. Biotronik now moves the Court to reconsider its decision or to transfer the dispute to the Western…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re: Citric Acid Litigation 7-Up Bottling Co.Of Jasper Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Mark v. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Edward J. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Ronald J. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Theofel v. Farey-JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vesta Corp. v. Amdocs Management Ltd.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Future Income Payments, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- In re Cote d'Azur Estate CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022
- In re Cote d'Azur Estate CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022
- Intellicad Technology Consortium v. Suzhou Gstarsoft Co. Ltd.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.