Legal Opinion
Black v. Ameritel Inns, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 2003No. 29580Published
1Opinion of the Court
81 P.3d 416 (2003)
139 Idaho 511
Robert BLACK, an individual, and Robert Marks, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AMERITEL INNS, INC., Defendant-Respondent.
No. 29580.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, September 2003 Term.
November 25, 2003.
John Todd, Boise, for appellants. Russell Jones argued.
Jim Jones, Boise, for respondent. Jim Jones argued.
KIDWELL, Justice.
Robert Black and Robert Marks (Appellants) sued Ameritel Inns, Inc. (Ameritel), alleging they were denied accommodations because they were Gypsies. The Appellants' attorney, licensed in Washington but not Idaho, filed a complaint in Idaho…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gonzales v. WyattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Edwin C. Covington v. Aubrey Cole, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Jaspercounty, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- IRON EAGLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC. v. Quality Design Systems, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Contempt Proceedings of BrainardIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Wrenn v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.