Legal Opinion

Town of Andover v. State Financial Services, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 17, 2000PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

This appeal presents the issue whether the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires landowners to receive actual notice of foreclosure proceedings barring rights of redemption. We hold that it does not.

1. Background. We summarize the facts found by a Land Court judge supplemented by uncontested documentary materials in the record. On October 10, 1990, State Financial Services, Inc. (State Financial), acquired the property at issue, an island in Fosters Pond located in the town of Andover (town), by a mortgage foreclosure deed. The foreclosure…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Roe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Carmel Credit Union v. BondesonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  3. John Izzo v. Victor RealtySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  4. City of Worcester v. AME Realty Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  5. Bailey v. Wells Fargo Bank, NAUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API