State of Arizona v. Rodney Christopher Jones
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VICE CHIEF JUSTICE BRUTINEL, opinion of the Court:
¶1 Rodney Christopher Jones appeals his convictions and sentences arising from his possession of hashish, a form of cannabis resin, A.R.S. §§ 13-3401(4)(a), -3408(A)(1), arguing that the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act ("AMMA") immunizes his conduct. AMMA defines marijuana as including "all parts of any plant of the genus cannabis whether growing or not." A.R.S. § 36-2801(8). Consistent with this language, we hold that AMMA's definition of marijuana includes both its dried-leaf/flower form and extracted resin, including hashish.
I
¶2 In March…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. Hon. hoggat/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Pattie Walcott v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca AllenArizona Supreme Court · 2022
- ASSOCIATED v. CITY OF PHOENIXCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
- Amy Silverman v. AdesArizona Supreme Court · 2024
- Chandler v. RooseveltArizona Supreme Court · 2026
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.