Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Rodney Christopher Jones

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2019No. CR-18-0370-PRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICE CHIEF JUSTICE BRUTINEL, opinion of the Court:

¶1 Rodney Christopher Jones appeals his convictions and sentences arising from his possession of hashish, a form of cannabis resin, A.R.S. §§ 13-3401(4)(a), -3408(A)(1), arguing that the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act ("AMMA") immunizes his conduct. AMMA defines marijuana as including "all parts of any plant of the genus cannabis whether growing or not." A.R.S. § 36-2801(8). Consistent with this language, we hold that AMMA's definition of marijuana includes both its dried-leaf/flower form and extracted resin, including hashish.

I

¶2 In March…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. Hon. hoggat/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pattie Walcott v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca AllenArizona Supreme Court · 2022
  3. ASSOCIATED v. CITY OF PHOENIXCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
  4. Amy Silverman v. AdesArizona Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Chandler v. RooseveltArizona Supreme Court · 2026

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API