Lisco State Bank v. McCombs Ranches, Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
URBOM, District Judge.
By his report and recommendation dated September 19, 1990, Magistrate David L. Piester recommended that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted. The plaintiff has objected. I conclude that the magistrate’s recommendation should be adopted.
The tenor of the plaintiff’s brief in support of its objection is that the Food Security Act of 1985, on which the magistrate’s recommendation is founded, is not applicable to this case because there is no danger in this case of “double jeopardy” — that is, of the buyer’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- AgriStor Leasing v. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Ronald J. Sommers v. International Business MacHines and West Publishing Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- J.K. Merrill & Son, Inc. v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Food Services of America v. Royal Heights, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- State Bank of Cherry v. CGB Enterprises, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2013
- Battle Creek State Bank v. PreuskerNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. TeveldalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- First National Bank & Trust v. Miami County Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.