Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1990No. 2591PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

In this appeal, we are called upon to determine whether a defendant is denied due process of law where the trial judge failed to disclose that he had previously accepted bribes from other defendants. We find no due process violation instantly, and affirm.

The facts and procedural history may be set forth as follows. On January 8, 1986, appellant was arrested and charged with robbery, theft and assault following an altercation in a bar. Appellant was tried and convicted of these charges after a bench trial. Appellant thereafter was sentenced but no subsequent review of the judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Judicial Inquiry & Review Board v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. TitoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In re A.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. SpencerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. People v. KnadeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API