State v. Fehr
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — Sandy Fehr appeals her convictions and sentences for three counts of delivery of methamphetamine, each with a sentencing enhancement for occurring within 1,000 feet of a school bus route stop,1 and one count *508of possession of methamphetamine.2 Fehr argues that the trial court erred by (1) admonishing Fehr to not show responses to the testimony, (2) deciding whether to replay an admitted recording to the jury without Fehr being present, and (3) providing the jury with special verdict forms that misstated the law regarding the sentencing enhancements. We affirm Fehr’s four convictions. But…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. IrbyWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Michael William RichieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Jacob TreasureCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Michael E. Rowland & Mazzar G. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State of Iowa v. Nathan Anthony WalterCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
- State of Washington v. Skyler Keneth ToddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017