State v. Senske
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Justice.
Defendant has been found guilty by a jury of aggravated robbery and he appeals his conviction on the grounds that:(1) The evidence presented by the state was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain the jury’s verdict;(2) The trial court erred in refusing to grant defendant’s motion to strike the testimony of a witness; and(3) Minn. St. 595.07, which authorizes the impeachment of any witness who has previously been convicted of a crime by proof of such violation, defeats defendant’s constitutional right to a fair trial.
On December 3, 1968, a man wearing a ski mask over his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. DamlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. PoelaertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- State v. KohuthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. FenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.