Legal Opinion

Betancourt v. Buggy Technologies Inc

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided December 9, 2024No. 1:23-cv-21184Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida David Betancourt, Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23-21184-Civ-Scola ) Buggy Technologies Inc and Isabel ) Berney, Defendants. ) Omnibus Order Previously, the Court referred Plaintiff David Betancourt’s two motions for default judgment (Pl.’s Mots., ECF Nos. 15, 30) to United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for a report and recommendations. (Court’s Ref., ECF Nos. 16, 31.) Judge Goodman issued a report, recommending that the Court deny Betancourt’s first motion, without prejudice (1st Rep. & Rec., ECF No. 18),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. William Hornady v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
  4. Burnett v. Railway OfficialsTennessee Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API