Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Railway Officials

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM MADISON. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Madison County. Levi S. Woods, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This is an action upon a policy of insurance in the Railway Officials & Employees Accident Association of Indianapolis, Indiana. There *186was a declaration and an amended declaration in the Court below which was demurred to. The demurrer was sustained and suit dismissed, and the plaintiff has appealed to this Court and assigned errors. The policy is set out in the declaration. It is marked on its back ‘ ‘Noncontestable Weekly Indemnity Policy,” in bold and prominent letters. The words “ Weekly Indemnity' are also made prominent by large letters in the face of the policy. So far as necessary to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosenberry v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Hall v. American Employers Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Kascoutas v. Federal Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. Betancourt v. Buggy Technologies IncDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
  4. Betancourt v. Buggy Technologies IncDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API