Legal Opinion

Lapique v. Plummer

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1914No. Civ. No. 1303PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal in this case is from an order vacating and setting aside the default of the defendant entered by the clerk — an order made before the entry of any judgment in the action. Appellant's contention, that such order entered by the clerk is to be regarded as a judgment, proceeds upon an entirely erroneous assumption. "Certainly it is not true that an order setting aside a default in an action where no judgment has been entered upon the default, is the subject of a separate appeal. It is in no sense an order after judgment and it is not one of the interlocutory orders enumerated in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Savage v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Figueroa Vda. de Arroyo v. Saldaña Crosas Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1932
  2. Mercantile Banking Co. v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Vázquez-Prada v. King Vda. de DooleySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1941
  4. Mercantile Banking Co. v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API