Legal Opinion

Mercantile Banking Co. v. Hernandez

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1931No. Docket No. 873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal herein is from an order vacating and setting aside the default of the defendant entered by the clerk — an order made before the entry of any judgment in the action. [1] Such an order, where it appears that no judgment has been entered upon the default, is not the subject of a separate appeal. It is in no sense an order made after judgment and is not one of the interlocutory orders enumerated in section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Savage v. Smith, 154 Cal. 325 [97 P. 821]; Rauer's Lawetc. Co. v. Standley, 3 Cal.App. 44 [84 P. 214]; Rose v.Lelande, 17 Cal.App. 308 [119 P.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. StandleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  2. Savage v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Rose v. LelandeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Lapique v. PlummerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davenport Bank & Trust Co. v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Benders v. StrattonMontana Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API