Legal Opinion

Rourke v. Hughes, Bozarth, Anderson Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 17, 1929No. 19474PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, commenced this action on February 27, 1922, seeking recovery of damages in double the yearly value for willful 'holding over real property as provided by section <5005, O. O. ¡á. 1921. A motion to make more definite and certain was sustained. On October 15, 1927, plaintiff sought to amend his I>etition, but after submitting the proposed amendment to the court the same was denied and a demurrer based upon the statute of limitations was sustained to the petition and the cause dismissed.

We consider the trial court’s action on the demurrer.

Section 6005, 0.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Plattsmouth v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Sullivan v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Rosenberg v. SprecherNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seidenbach's v. AultSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API