Legal Opinion

Seidenbach's v. Ault

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 26, 1931No. 19879Published

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment based upon a penalty statute, section 6005, C. O. S. 1921, providing for recovery by tbe landlord from a tenant of double tbe rental value of real property for (a) willful bolding over of real property after the termination of tenancy, (b) after notice to quit has been duly given, and (c) demand of possession made.

The undisputed facts are:

Ault and Seidenbach’s Corporation entered into a written lease for occupancy of a store by tbe latter at 119 S. Main street, Tulsa, Okla. By tbe terms of said lease tbe tenancy expired February 1, 1927. Seiden-bach’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rourke v. Hughes, Bozarth, Anderson Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API