Vandall v. Teague
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. J. R.'Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Foreclosure of mortgage. Plaintiff had judgment of foreclosure as to the defendant the administrator of the estate of William Teague, but judgment was denied as against the interest of defendant Hattie Teague. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment. The following facts appear from the findings and proceedings: In 1883 William and Mary Teague were husband and wife; the mortgaged premises belonged to them as the property of the community; in that year Mrs. Teague duly filed a homestead on the premises; on August 14, 1889, William and Mary Teague executed to plaintiff’s assignor, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tynan v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Sichel v. De CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Collins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Sheehy v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Sanders v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Hibernia Sav. and Loan Soc. v. FarnhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Cache National Bank v. LusherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Geimann v. Board of Police Commr's.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Delfelder v. Teton Land & Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.