Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Nixon
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 12, 1955No. 12779PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
The controlling question presented by this appeal is whether S. H. Nixon took a determinable fee or a life estate only, under the last will and testament of his wife, Lucy Nixon. The pertinent provisions of the will involved read as follows:
"I give all my property, both real and personal, to my husband, S. H. Nixon, to use, manage, sell and dispose of as he may see fit and proper just as long as he .remains unmarried, and in case of his marriage after my death, then such property as remains on hand shall go to my children share and share alike, and if any of my children have…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Darragh v. BarmoreTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Frame v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Briggs v. PeeblesTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Haring v. SheltonTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Medlin v. MedlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gee v. ReadTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Carr v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Welch v. StraachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Zint v. CroftonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. CainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.