Legal Opinion

Bohanan v. Amsberry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 30, 2019No. A165661Published

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

*516*740In this proceeding for post-conviction relief pursuant to ORS 138.510 to 138.680, petitioner appeals a limited judgment imposing filing fees. In his sole assignment of error, petitioner contends that the post-conviction court erred "in issuing a limited monetary judgment against" him. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

"Appellate review of post-conviction proceedings is limited to questions of law appearing in the record." Dillard v. Premo , 296 Or. App. 798, 803, 441 P.3d 609 (2019). We review petitioner's arguments accordingly.

The pertinent facts are not in dispute. Petitioner filed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. EdmondsOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. Vasquez-RubioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API