Bohanan v. Amsberry
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.
*516*740In this proceeding for post-conviction relief pursuant to ORS 138.510 to 138.680, petitioner appeals a limited judgment imposing filing fees. In his sole assignment of error, petitioner contends that the post-conviction court erred "in issuing a limited monetary judgment against" him. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
"Appellate review of post-conviction proceedings is limited to questions of law appearing in the record." Dillard v. Premo , 296 Or. App. 798, 803, 441 P.3d 609 (2019). We review petitioner's arguments accordingly.
The pertinent facts are not in dispute. Petitioner filed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. EdmondsOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. Vasquez-RubioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.