Legal Opinion

Jardine, Matheson & Co. v. Pacific Orient Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1929No. Docket No. 6971PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal herein upon the ground that the order from which it was taken is not appealable. The determination of the motion involves the construction of section 1293 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which is' one of several code sections enacted by the legislature in 1927 relating to the enforcement of agreements to arbitrate controversies growing out of written contracts (Code Civ. Proc., secs. 1280-1293, incl. [(Stats. 1927, p. 404, sec. 1), secs. 1281-1290 (Stats. 1927, pp. 404-407, secs. 2-11), secs. 1291-1293 (Stats. 1927, pp. 407, 408, secs. 12-14)]).

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. Bank of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Wesley Retirement Services, Inc. v. Hansen Lind Meyer, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API