Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific First Benefit, LLC

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 11, 2007No. 02 C 8678PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court are Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment against Defendant Alex Orphanou and Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Monetary Judgment against the Corporate Defendants. For the following reasons, the Motions are granted.

I. BACKGROUND 1

A. Facts

Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “the Commission”) brings this action against Defendants Pacific First Benefit, LLC, Key Nation Benefit, LLC, First Federal Benefit, LLC, Federal Credit Services, Limited, (“the Companies”), and Alex Orphanou (“Orphanou”). Plaintiff FTC is an independent agency…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. NHS Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Soto v. Future Motion, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API