State v. Rosenbush
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
McKEIG, Justice.
In 2017, a sheriff's deputy arrested appellant Jennifer Rosenbush for driving while impaired ("DWI") and obtained a search warrant to take a sample of her blood for alcohol concentration testing. When the deputy presented Rosenbush with the search warrant, he read her the newly enacted implied-consent advisory for blood and urine tests. It informs drivers only that "refusal to submit to a blood or urine test is a crime." See Minn. Stat. § 171.177, subd. 1 (2018). Rosenbush allowed her blood to be drawn, and tests showed that she had an alcohol concentration over the legal…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jensen v. Comm'r SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- State of Minnesota v. Isabella Anne GendronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Samuel Alejondro TorrezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024