Legal Opinion

State v. Beyer

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 7, 2001No. 00-0036PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYKMAN, PJ.

¶ 1. Deryl B. Beyer appeals from a judgment committing him to a secure mental health facility after a jury found that he was a sexually violent person. He argues that, because his probable cause hearing was held after the statutory seventy-two-hour time limit, the trial court lost competence to proceed and the petition for his commitment should have been dismissed. We disagree and conclude that, because the seventy-two-hour time limit is directory, the court did not lose competence.

¶ 2. Beyer also argues that at trial, the State failed to prove an element essential to a Wis. Stat.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kett v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. KYWANDA F.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Beyer v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. State v. BeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API