Department of Energy v. Hunt
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
THORNBERRY, Judge:
This appeal presents a narrow issue: whether the district court abused its discretion in holding that the Department of Energy (DOE) failed to demonstrate a change in core circumstances requiring remand of a lawful remedial order to the agency for reconsideration. We are not asked to determine the district court’s power or duty to fashion a restitutionary remedy. Compare United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240, 1280-87 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App. 1985); Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Edwards, 669 F.2d 717, 723 (Temp.Emer. Ct.App.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 877, 103 S.Ct. 172,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Follette v. BurgosSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Washington v. Sherwin Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Exxon Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Porter v. Shearson Lehman Bros. Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1992
- In re Seville Entertainment Complex of Pensacola, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1986