Legal Opinion

Reiter v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 2, 1946No. 4-8000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. MoFaddiN, Justice.

This appeal results from an unsuccessful attempt by the appellants to have the chancery court declare the appellee to be a trustee ex maleficio. J. N. Carroll was the father of eight children, seven of whom survive him. The appellants are five of Mr. Carroll’s children, and also two grandchildren (heirs of his deceased child). The appellee is a child of Mr. Carroll. Mr. Carroll’s other child is neither-appellant nor appellee, but was a party to this canse in the lower court.

In March, 1934, when he was about to submit to surgery, Mr. J. N. Carroll executed his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dowd v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
  2. In Re Estate of SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Brazil v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Bohleber v. RebstockIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Heirs of Blanchard v. Heirs of BlanchardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of O'DonnellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Mosely v. MoselySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Hawkins v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Kramer v. FreedmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API