Kramer v. Freedman

I respectfully dissent.

I believe we do have jurisdiction, based on conflict between the decision sought to be reviewed and Moneyham v. Hamilton.1

*98The long and complicated details of this case were cogently set forth in the decision of the Third District, and, in view of the complex fact pattern involved, bear repeating here:

“Appellants, defendants before the trial court, seek review of an adverse final judgment in a non-jury trial impressing a constructive trust in appellee’s favor upon the assets of the estate of her father, Harry Freedman.

“The status of the respective parties and the…