Legal Opinion

Schloss Poster Advertising Co. v. City of Rock Hill

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 4, 1939No. 14854PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburne.

Appellant seeks reversal of a decree of the lower Court declaring valid an ordinance of the City of- Rock Plill and refusing to issue a writ of mandamus requiring the respondents to issue to him a permit to- erect certain billboards upon lots leased by him within the city limits. The pertinent portion of the ordinance under consideration reads as follows: “Hereafter it shall be unlawful to erect or maintain any billboard facing on any public street or other public place within the incorporate limits of the City of Rock Hill…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. RadeckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  3. In re FrazerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. State v. . TenantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. City of Richmond v. DudleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Richards v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  2. South Carolina State Highway Department v. HarbinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  3. Restaurant Row Associates v. Horry CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Peterson Outdoor Advertising v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. City of Darlington v. AW STANLEY, JR.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API