Legal Opinion

Clark v. . Dill.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Plaintiff brings this special proceeding under Chapter 9 of the Consolidated Statutes to establish the dividing line between his land and an adjoining tract owned by the defendant. He alleges that the boundary line between the two tracts is in dispute, and further, that the defendant has trespassed across the line and committed waste upon plaintiff’s land, the territory in dispute.

The defendant answered and denied plaintiff’s title; whereupon the proceeding was transferred to the civil issue docket. Brown v. Hutchinson, 155 N. C., 205, 71 S. E., 302.

Upon the trial, the defendant tendered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woody v. Fountain.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Brown v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Smith v. Johnson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Williams v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Brown v. . HutchinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. Fairview Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Nowell v. . BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Roberts v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Austin v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Bumgarner v. CorpeningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API