Legal Opinion

Brown v. . Hutchinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 12, 1911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This was an action brought originally before the clerk under the Processioning Act (Rev., sec. 326) to establish a boundary line. The issue of title being raised by the answer, the cause was properly transferred for trial to the Superior Court at term. Smith v. Johnson, 137 N.C. 43; Stanaland v. Rabon, 140 N.C. 202; Davis v. Wall, 142 N.C. 452;Woody v. Fountain, 143 N.C. 69; Green v. Williams, 144 N.C. 63.

The first exception is that the judge refused to permit the plaintiff to introduce in evidence a deed from Absher to Brown, executed in December, 1859, as a part of the plaintiff's chain of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Condry v. . CheshireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Gilchrist v. . MiddletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Arrington v. . ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Starling v. Selma Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Davis v. Wall.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. 7,405.3 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Simmons v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Bowden v. BowdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Richmond Cedar Works v. PinnixDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1913
  5. United States v. Hiawassee Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API