Legal Opinion

Murray v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 23, 1931No. A-7854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Canadian county of the crime of unlawful possession of a still, and his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $250 and imprisonment in the county jail for 60 days.

The evidence of the state w%s that the officers, having a search warrant, searched the premises of defendant; that when they reached defendant’s home there were a woman and some children in the yard; that the officers gave a copy of. the search warrant to the defendant’s wife; that a little way west of the house there was a lane leading from…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Harvey v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Merwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Murray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. O'Niel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API