Legal Opinion

Murray v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 15, 1931No. A-8046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to' as the defendant, was convicted of hav ing possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced .to pay a fine of $250, and to. be imprisoned in the county jail for 90 days. This is a companion case to Murray v. State, 51 Okla. Cr. 45, 299 Pac. 506. Under the provisions of sections 2619 and 2626, C. O. ,S. 1921, the defendant, in addition to his plea of not guilty, filed a plea of former conviction.

The oral testimony introduced in the case and the stipulation is that the evidence of the state witnesses in the former case is the same as that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Murray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heldenbrand v. MillsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Heldenbrand v. MillsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API