Legal Opinion

Bush v. Rust-Oleum Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 10, 2024No. 3:20-cv-03268Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 ANTHONY BUSH, Case No. 20-cv-03268-LB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO 13 v. EXCLUDE EXPERT OPINIONS 14 RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION, Re: ECF Nos. 131, 163 15 Defendant. 16 17 INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT 18 This is a consumer-products mislabeling case. On behalf of a class of California consumers, 19 the plaintiff challenges defendant Rust-Oleum’s labeling of its “Krud Kutter” cleaning products as 20 “non-toxic” and “Earth friendly,” contending that the products in fact can cause harm to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Torres v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API