Legal Opinion

State v. Hanson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1991No. C3-90-1628PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for the manufacture of marijuana, Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd. 1(1) (1988). Appellant Gordon Hanson challenges the trial court’s exclusion of a defense of medical necessity. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Gordon Hanson has suffered from epilepsy since 1956. Over the years, Hanson’s doctors have prescribed many of the major available anti-seizure medications. Hanson complained about the side effects of these medications. In 1975, Hanson began experimenting with marijuana for medicinal purposes. He was convicted of marijuana possession in 1982. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. State v. DianaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. State v. TateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. State v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. PolingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. KratovilAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. LoraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  4. State v. BonjourSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. Haumant v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API