Legal Opinion

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 14, 1994No. Civ. 90-1665 PHX RCBPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BROOMFIELD, Chief Judge.

Defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company has filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Resolution Trust Corporation (the “RTC”) opposes the motion. The court heard oral argument on the matter on September 12, 1994, and now rules.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is the second time that Aetna has moved for summary judgment in this case. In a previous order, the court granted Aetna’s first motion with regard to a number of issues, but denied it with regard to others. In its second motion for summary judgment, Aetna…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. First Security Savings v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co. v. James L. Gillette, Third Party First Security Bank & Trust v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. A. W. LottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Curtis 260104 v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  2. Cyfred, Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Guam · 2009
  3. Footprint International LLC v. Footprint Asia LimitedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  4. Guinard v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  5. Hill v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.District Court, D. Guam · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API