Hill v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
District Court, D. Guam
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF GUAM 7 SURENDRANI HILL, 8 Civil Case No. 07-00034 Plaintiff, 9 vs. ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION 10 TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC., et al., COMPLAINT 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 This case is before the court on Defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended 15 Complaint,” brought under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Docket 16 No. 69. Having considered the filings and relevant authorities, the court hereby DENIES 17 Defendant’s motion in its entirety, for the reasons given below.1 18 I.…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.