Legal Opinion

Tinker v. Hobbs

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1956No. 6034PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LA PRADE, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant, Ralph Tinker, brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. After a trial by jury resulting in a verdict for defendant, plaintiff moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial, both of which were denied. This ap peal is from the adverse judgment and the orders denying said motions.

Appellant was injured in 1952 when the family car, being driven by his wife, Love Tinker, collided with defendant’s automobile. In March, 1953 Ralph Tinker filed this action in his individual name. In June,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kesler v. PabstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Fox Tucson Theatres Corp. v. LindsayArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Pacific Construction Co. v. CochranArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Trefzer v. StilesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Heimke v. MunozArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Di Tolvo v. Di TolvoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Jurek v. JurekArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Mervin Carlos McKinney v. Joseph Boyle, Edith White Boyle, His Wife, and Reba J. BoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. Kenyon v. KenyonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API