St. Landry Homestead Federal Savings Bank v. Vidrine
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
[ i Hubert Vidrine, Jr., Tammy J. Vidrine, and Vidrine Estates, LLC (the Vidrines) are both defendants and plaintiffs-in-re-convention in this litigation. They are before this court appealing the trial court judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff and defendant-in-reconvention, St. Landry Homestead Federal Savings Bank (the Bank), granting its peremptory exception of no cause of action and dismissing their reconventional demand. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment in part, reverse it in part, and remand the matter to the trial court for further proceedings…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- John W. Dussouy, Jr. v. Gulf Coast Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Fink v. BryantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hanks v. Louisiana CompaniesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Guillory v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Woodlands Development, L.L.C. v. Regions BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Byline Bank v. Alexandria Hospitality PartnersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
- Caldwell Wholesale Co., L.L.C. v. R J Reynolds TobCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.