Legal Opinion
Mayfield v. San Jacinto Savings Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 22, 1990No. C14-89-591-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.
This appeal concerns the application of the statute of limitations to usury claims. In separate transactions, each of the three sets of appellants borrowed funds from the appellee for home improvements. The loans were repayable in monthly installments and were secured by second liens on the borrowers’ residences. Each of the appellants prepaid their notes prior to the time the respective loans matured. Subsequently, each appellant filed suit against the appellee claiming that the interest charged and collected in connection with the loans was usurious. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Grant v. Austin Bridge Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Danziger v. San Jacinto Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Coppedge v. Colonial Savings & Loan Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Loyd v. ECO Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Bara v. Major Funding Corp. Liquidating TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. AbshireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Adams (In Re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1992
- Emilia Bara and Richard Bara v. Major Funding Corporation Liquidating Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.