Legal Opinion

Coppedge v. Colonial Savings & Loan Ass'n

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 3, 1986No. 05-86-00039-CVPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AKIN, Justice.

Mark and Wendy Coppedge appeal from a summary judgment granted against them on their claim against Colonial Savings & Loan Association to recover for usurious interest charged and received by Colonial. The Coppedges contend that the trial court erred in granting Colonial’s motion for summary judgment and in overruling theirs because Colonial charged and received usurious interest from the Coppedg-es. Consequently, they argue that they are entitled to statutory penalties and attorney fees, as well as common-law damages, as a matter of law. We agree with the Coppedges that they…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Knight v. International Harvester Credit Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Nevels v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Tanner Development Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Gonzales County Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. McCulloch v. Fox & Jacobs, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Waffle House, Inc. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Cash America International Inc. v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Holmans v. Transource Polymers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Hoxie Implement Co., Inc. v. Baker, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
  5. Woodcrest Associates, Ltd. v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API