Legal Opinion

Batty v. City of Hastings

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1901No. 11,671PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Adams county. Heard below before Adams, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, C.

In 1892 the city council of Hastings, pursuant to a petition purporting to be signed by the owners of a majority in front-feet of the property abutting upon certain streets, created a paving district and, after a proposition had been duly submitted and voted upon and bonds issued for pav-ing the intersections, proceeded in November, 1894, to as*28sess the cost of paying said district upon the property abutting on the several streets therein. This suit urns brought by some thirty-eight property owners in said district to have such assessment declared invalid, to enjoin collection of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miner v. . BeekmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Eve v. LouisIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Schoener v. . LissauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. American Emigrant Co. v. FullerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  5. Quinn v. KelloggColorado Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cooper v. RheaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. City of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. Criswell v. CriswellNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  4. City of Charlotte v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. City of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API